![]() He argues proponents of this view have forgotten its origins and that it is based merely on habit: what is useful has always been defined as good, therefore usefulness is goodness as a value. He criticizes the view (which he identifies with contemporary British ideology) that good is everything that is helpful, and bad is everything that is harmful. Nietzsche defined master morality as the morality of the strong-willed. Christian virtues and vices, Kantian deontology).įor Nietzsche, a morality is inseparable from the culture that values it, meaning that each culture's language, codes, practices, narratives, and institutions are informed by the struggle between these two moral structures. the classical virtues of the noble man versus the vices of the rabble), unlike slave morality, which judges by a scale of good or evil intentions (e. Master morality judges actions as good or bad (e.g. Master morality values pride, wealth, fame and power, while slave morality values kindness, empathy, and sympathy. Nietzsche argues that there are two fundamental types of morality: "master morality" and "slave morality". Master–slave morality ( German: Herren- und Sklavenmoral) is a central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's works, particularly in the first essay of his book On the Genealogy of Morality. JSTOR ( January 2017) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message).Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.įind sources: "Master–slave morality" – news ![]() This article relies excessively on references to primary sources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |